
I respect the ability of all my opponents until they prove otherwise. Just like I’m not as good as say quickslvrflash or notser but I’ve sunk them both when they had an unlucky match and I was in the right place.īetter to just assume your enemy will play well or do the best possible counter to your strategy and plan accordingly. If I have a ‘meh’ game but a ‘bad’ player has a good game, the’yll probably beat me. I might be MORE likely than average to have a good game, but that doesn’t mean any given game I’ll beat an average player. Doesn’t mean I’ll be a threat to you unless you play poorly or I’m in the right place at the right time. For a while (heck maybe even now, don’t really know or care) I was in the top 50 leaderboard for NA HMS Hood players. I’m quite above average though I only have the occasional Unicum day. Stats are useful but more so to help you get better yourself. I suppose BUT there are many MANY other factors that affect how you fight that knowing how good your opponent is just doesn’t matter much. This can be a great tool to help you practice and strengthen emotional control and self-discipline. Or you could take a more winning attitude approach and focus on the reality that information is power, and that added information can be used to help you know who you can depend on, who you can't, and who on the enemy team is the biggest threat in order to develop a higher probability winning strategy during the match.Īllowing objective performance metrics to influence your emotional state is a sign of emotional fragility.
